<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are photographers really a threat?</title>
	<link>http://www.kalyr.com/weblog/2008/06/08/are-photographers-really-a-threat/</link>
	<description>RPGs. Trains, and bands that write 12 minute songs about Hobbits</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Orton</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.com/weblog/2008/06/08/are-photographers-really-a-threat/#comment-3244</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Orton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kalyr.com/weblog/2008/06/08/are-photographers-really-a-threat/#comment-3244</guid>
		<description>Not so long ago our church warden was hauled in by the police for taking a photo of a rare bus double-decker bus going under a particulalry low railway bridge.

So it's not just the railway enthusiasts who are under threat, anyone taking a photo which happens to have a railway bridge in it is vulnerable.

On a similar theme, someone taking a picture of a model locomotive at my club got an ear-bashing from the mother of a child who happened to be in the proximity.   Since it was a digital camera, the peace was kept by deleting the offending photo and taking another, but if it had been a film camera the situation would have been far more fraught.

It seems anyone wielding a camera is a threat to someone.   How long before carrying a mobile phone with a camera in becomes a public order offence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so long ago our church warden was hauled in by the police for taking a photo of a rare bus double-decker bus going under a particulalry low railway bridge.</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s not just the railway enthusiasts who are under threat, anyone taking a photo which happens to have a railway bridge in it is vulnerable.</p>
<p>On a similar theme, someone taking a picture of a model locomotive at my club got an ear-bashing from the mother of a child who happened to be in the proximity.   Since it was a digital camera, the peace was kept by deleting the offending photo and taking another, but if it had been a film camera the situation would have been far more fraught.</p>
<p>It seems anyone wielding a camera is a threat to someone.   How long before carrying a mobile phone with a camera in becomes a public order offence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
