kalyr.com

Trains should replace planes?

So says the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (RCEP) in this BBC article.

Instead of encouraging airport expansion and proliferation, it is essential that the government should divert resources into encouraging a shift from air to high-speed rail for internal UK travel and some intra-European journeys.

The amount of pollution (especially CO2) from air travel is far higher per passenger-mile than rail. Britain's problem that, unlike France and Germany, we've failed to invest in a high-speed rail network, preferring patchwork upgrades to existing lines dating from the Victorian era.

The RCEP isn't taking a Luddite line that air travel is evil, only that as much short-haul traffic as possible should go by rail.

Not that this argument will cut any ice with the head-in-the-sand crowd who are still 'in denial' about global warming.

Posted by TimHall at November 29, 2002 03:27 PM | TrackBack
Comments
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?



Links of the day
Sixteen Tons

Electric Nose talks coal wagons.

Ficticious Liveries

The AC Loco Group's Ficticious Liveries are back! SWT HSTs, BR Blue 66s and many more.

The hell inside carraige 346A

A London Firefighter tells of his story of the July 7th bombings.

Hatfield Fines

13 million pound fine for Balfour Beatty and Notwork Rail. But the ivory tower moonbats of the Adam Smith Institute who are ultimately to blame get off scot free...

The Great Hole of Tescos

"There was no light at the end of the tunnel". The Guardian has the 'hole' story.