kalyr.com

Reasons not to read Dan Brown

Making Light and their commenters put the boot in to the awful hack thrillers of Dan Brown.

I've managed to avoid them myself, even though half my work colleagues seem to be reading him, even when I tell them they ought to be reading Neal Stephenson instead. One of them is even amused when a Google search on "Illuminati" brought back this page of mine.

Why do his books sell so well if they're so terrible? There are a number of theories, such as the ones suggested by SF author John M Ford:

[Ursula] LeGuin noted some time back that people will buy bestsellers (and go to hit movies) because they can participate, through the Law of Contagion, in the money involved. Film is the most expensive art form we have, which is one reason it's taken so seriously.

And there's also the Book Everybody is Reading factor, which is like the Movie (or, if you live in New York, Broadway Show) Everybody is Seeing. It's easy to get left out of the conversation if you don't get the references. (Note that there's at least one book annotating the references, so you can both not read the novel and pretend you know more about it than people who have. Which leaves you both about even.)

Or maybe it's because Dan Brown's cliché-ridden pabulum is sold in supermarkets, so is readily available to the types that don't darken the doors of a proper bookshop, filled with a such a bewildering array of titles that it means they have to make actual decisions about what to read.

The same thing happens with music. As in this quote from a review of the new album by The Darkness:

This album does not come close to the quality release of the last Journey album, Generations.

It almost unfair to compare this CD to bast array of recent good hard rock releases that come through my door. For an album that many people can find in their local supermarket, this is no doubt one of the best rock releases of the year.

So I think people should be reading Neal Stephenson and Gene Wolfe rather than Dan Brown, and be listening to Opeth and Porcupine Tree rather than Franz Ferdinand or Coldplay. Does this make me a snob? Or just someone who ignores media hype?

Posted by TimHall at December 18, 2005 10:42 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Not at all! It makes you someone with a brain and a personally developed sense of taste, and God knows that's a rarity.

That said...

As odd as this may sound, I would rather have a conversation with someone who has their own, independently-developed appreciation for even something wildly popular (read: crap) than someone who rejects popular things simply because they ARE popular.

There's no crime in liking Journey because you genuinely feel they make good music. The problem is when you like Journey because you have no idea what else is out there, or when you read Dan Brown because that's the outer limits of what you can think of as a decent book.

There's a term, "middlebrow," that perfectly sums up what Brown and people like him are putting out. It gives you the feeling of being an intellectual without actually forcing you to rethink anything.

Posted by: Gline on December 19, 2005 01:24 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?



Links of the day
How to write a best selling fantasy novel.

It's easy! Just don't say 'and the venerable wizard raised the orb and muttered the Arnic words "Hastalavista".' (via)

Ten Stupid Utopias

Strange Horizons goes from Plato's Republic to The Internet.

Klingon Fairy Tales

Thanks to **Dave for the link to Klingon Fairy Tales. An example:

"The Hare Foolishly Lowers His Guard and Is Devastated by the Tortoise, Whose Prowess in Battle Attracts Many Desirable Mates"

Pig Elvish

Ranslat�t� ��ry� �xtt� nt�ith �gp�n Lv�sheth

Is Horror Reactionary?

Ken Hite on H.P.Lovecraft.